Merging 58 multicultural financial institutions into just 10 anchor groups at breakneck speed is a monumental undertaking.
For a case study into the complexity of mergers in the Asian banking sector, it
would be difficult to find a more compelling example than the experience of
Malaysia. The country's 58 financial institutions raced the clock to
complete the mergers by 31 December 2000. The names of the 10 core anchor banks
had only been confirmed on 14 February 2000.
Whether Saint Valentine's Day was an appropriate date to announce such a hurried
and largely unwanted union will depend on just how well the banks manage the
phenomenal challenges. Never before had the global banking industry seen
mergers of such a magnitude.
Malaysia's 58 financial institutions operate a total of 2,712 branches, serving
a population of 22.5 million. Each new anchor group now operates one
commercial bank, one merchant bank and one finance company. The decision to
consolidate the banking industry was made in the wake of the Asian financial
crisis. The turmoil exposed the weakness in the domestic banking sector and
consolidation was the prescribed cure.
While the mergers were to be completed by the last day of 2000, the banks were given until well into 2001 to merge operationally. The process of
integration poses significant challenges for the banks in terms of the
organizational and people issues, especially given the involuntary nature of
the exercise.
Hewitt Associates recognizes three crucial keys to success in any merger,
regardless of the industries the companies operate in. These are: selection of
the best people in pivotal roles, retention of the most talented employees, and
the integration of the cultures of the merging parties.
Three Steps to Success
To ensure the success of a merger, three issues are of paramount importance.
They are:
- Selection of best people in pivotal roles
- Retention of key talent
- Integration of cultures
Pivotal People
One of the first major decisions an anchor bank must make concerns the question
of leadership. Key positions must be assigned because doubts over leadership
will add to the uncertainty felt by employees. It is an issue that must be
addressed even before the merger begins. Financial institutions that value
teamwork, or believe that "the whole is greater than the sum of the parts", may
choose to select the entire team of high performers from one of the
organizations when deciding how to staff a merged unit. This enables swift
staffing of the new bank, and conventional wisdom on the criteria for a
successful merger indicates that speed is of the essence to fully realize
synergies. Conversely, there is a possibility that the team's culture and
operating style are not aligned to that of the new entity. The 'cherry-picking'
approach ensures that the best talent is retained within the new bank, but may
also mean that the new team does not immediately attain the highest level of
productivity. The drawback here is that this process takes time, during which
productivity will not be as high as it could be.
The Bonus of Talent Retention
Mergers are a time of great uncertainty and anxiety for all staff. An added
complication for retaining key talent in the Malaysian banking sector is the
advent of some strong forces of demand that have created a tightening in the
Malaysian banking labor market and provided them with the opportunity to seek
alternative sources of employment very easily. These forces include the
recovery of the Malaysian economy, demand for foreign talent among Singapore
banks, the proliferation of dotcom companies, a renewed focus by some foreign
banks on Asian markets, and the extended economic expansion in the U.S. (which
has led many Malaysians to choose to remain in the U.S. after completing their
tertiary education).
A possible solution may be the provision of retention bonuses aimed at securing
the services of key talent through and beyond the merger process. Asian
financial institutions have been reticent to consider this option, primarily
because it conflicts with the prevalent collectivist culture within Asia
(rather than the individualist culture more common in Anglo Saxon countries).
Nevertheless, retention bonuses proved successful in Deutsche Bank's merger
with Bankers Trust and in many other global mergers.
Key Aspects of a Retention Bonus Program
Eligibility:
Conventional wisdom states that these programs should be targeted at top
executive talent rather than be broad based. Nevertheless, the drawback of a
targeted approach is that there is a strong possibility of alienating other
employees.
Amount:
This should be large enough to encourage the desired behavior, which in this
case is not only retention but also maintaining productivity through the merger
period. As such, the payment should also be tied to key merger success
indicators.
Payment Schedule:
To ensure that the twin motives of retention and productivity are achieved,
payments should be scheduled throughout the period of the program but the
larger payments should be held back until the end of the program.
Cultural Scan Nets Differences
Research by Hewitt Associates shows that, especially in Asia, cultural
integration is the biggest barrier to the success of a merger. Cultural
integration issues are greatest in global cross-border mergers, such as that of
Credit Suisse and First Boston, but also occur in regional cross-border
mergers, such the acquisition of Kwong On Bank in Hong Kong by Development Bank
of Singapore. The reason for this is that, in these types of mergers, one has
to face differences in both organizational culture and the national culture.
While mergers between domestic financial institutions do not raise issues on the
national culture front, they do present challenges in terms of differences in
organizational culture. Furthermore, Malaysia has historically had problems
associated with trying to balance the interests of a multicultural society.
An example is that a number of the anchor groups contain merger partners in
which one institution has a dominant culture that reflects a particular race in
Malaysia, while the other merger partner may have a dominant culture that
reflects the value system of a different race. These differences in culture can
lead to several common problems in merger situations. The most serious of these
are:
- Dysfunctional teams
- Grid-locked decision making processes
- Reduced productivity
- Confrontation and conflict with the attendant
workplace stress
- Lost business development opportunities
In order to overcome these differences, the organizations involved in the
current merger process should consider undertaking a cultural scan. This is
designed to capture the prevalent values, beliefs and attitudes with respect to
such factors as propensity for teamwork, management style, performance
orientation, communication approach and decision making processes. Such a scan
highlights areas of differences that can be reconciled through team building
workshops and areas of common ground that can provide the foundation to build a
new culture that will support the new strategic direction of the merged
organization.
The consolidation program designed by Bank Negara, to ensure that the Malaysian
banking and finance sector becomes more competitive domestically and in the
global marketplace, is ambitious, progressive and timely. In order to ensure
the success of this program, both consultants and bank management alike must
pay special attention to the people and organizational challenges that arise
from this program.
The anchor groups that deal most effectively with these issues will develop a
strategic advantage in the new global competitive landscape that is already
sweeping Malaysia.