Sharad Vishvanath, Practice Leader, Analytics Consulting, India & West Asia
Since joining the WTO in 1995, India has experienced extreme economic growth,
emerging as one of the leading foreign investment tickets in Asia. This has had
a dramatic impact on the local talent market, and today, local companies and
multinationals are not only competing for the same customers, they are also
competing for the same people. As a result, rewarding performance effectively
is now a key differentiator for Indian companies as they look to attract,
retain and motivate employees.
Over the last five years, Hewitt has conducted extensive research into
performance and rewards in India. The results of our research identified three
clear trends:
-
A strong correlation between economic growth and salary levels;
-
Companies are increasingly rewarding, recognizing and reinforcing performance;
and,
-
The rationalization of compensation structures.
An In-Depth Analysis
A Strong Correlation Between Economic Growth and Salary Levels
A strong correlation between economic growth and salary levels was clearly
demonstrated across many sectors, with high-performing sectors consistently
recording higher pay increases. Three examples from the Hewitt India Annual
Salary Increase surveys demonstrate this point.
The IT and ITeS sectors have demonstrated consistent growth over the past four
years, and rank among the highest paying industries in India. Since 2001, the
IT industry has seen scores of benefits from the government, making it one of
India’s leading sectors. The ITeS boom began in 2003 when the sector grew by
over 60 percent and revenues sky-rocketed. The year 2004 saw a Compound Annual
Growth Rate (CAGR) of 64 percent, and this success continued into 2005, so it
comes as no surprise that this sector has been paying higher increases with
every passing year.
Sudden spurts in sector performance have historically led to salary increases.
For instance, 2001 was good for the telecommunications industry, with high
growth fuelled by expansions following a new telecom policy. As a result the
industry awarded its employees the highest salary increase of the year at 18.9
percent.
A similar situation arose in 2005 for asset management companies, when the
sector grew by 37 percent from the previous year. SENSEX reached an all time
high, which led to the mass participation of retail investors in new fund
offers and many asset management companies (AMCs) expanding operations to
first- and second-tier cities to increase customer reach. This, in turn,
resulted in fierce competition for talent, and many companies used high salary
increases to help attract and retain the best people.
Companies Are Increasingly Rewarding, Recognizing and Reinforcing Performance
Hewitt research clearly demonstrates a continued trend towards rewarding,
recognizing and reinforcing performance in organizations.
In the Hewitt India Annual Salary Increase Survey 2005-06, some 99.5
percent of participating organizations said they had a formal Performance
Management system (PMS) in place, compared to 97 percent in 2001. More than
three quarters of participating studies ranked "pay for performance" as the top
criteria in their reward strategy.
Our research also demonstrates that the implementation of variable pay is also
on the increase. Only 85 percent of organizations had variable pay plans in
2001, compared to 89 percent in 2005. Significantly, variable pay as a
percentage of total compensation has increased from an average of 11.5 percent
to nearly 19 percent across all sectors.
Many organizations today actively differentiate high performers, and in the
2005-06 study high performers received double the salary increase of an average
performer.
Sectors also display differentiation in their appetite for variable pay
|
Industry |
2001 Variable Pay |
2005 Variable Pay |
| Manufacturing |
11% |
16.20% |
| Banking |
13.50% |
23.30% |
| IT |
10.90% |
13.70% |
| ITeS |
12.90% |
16.40% |
| Telecommunications |
14% |
17.80% |
| Financial Services |
19.20% |
23.50% |
| FMCG |
13.30% |
16.50% |
Hewitt’s research also shows that the services sectors offer variable pay more
than capital intensive sectors. The success of a services company lies in its
people, and therefore service-oriented organizations are more willing to
include a higher variable pay component in their compensation structures.
Furthermore, most service-oriented companies are in what are termed "new economy
sectors" such as IT, telecom, ITeS, AMCs and insurance. These companies don’t
have the legacy issues inherent in some of the old economy sectors, which tend
to have more long-term employees.
Banks, financial services and AMCs are the most aggressive organizations when it
comes to variable pay as a percentage of total compensation. Many HR managers
attribute this skew to the fact that it is easier to measure performance in the
financial services industry versus in many other sectors.
These industries are followed by the telecom and ITeS sectors, which have been
largely responsible for India’s recent high economic growth phenomenon.
Unfortunately employees with the necessary skill set are limited and,
therefore, companies employ aggressive incentive strategies to retain their
talent.
The Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) and manufacturing sectors have
traditionally been more conservative when it comes to variable pay, since
organizations in these old economy sectors tend to focus on total rewards
rather than on total compensation.
Compensation Structure Rationalization
Salary structures are being simplified across most industries. Historically,
compensation structures comprised of 22 pay components, each to ensure that the
employee paid the least amount of tax possible. In line with international
structures and due to changes in the government’s direct tax policy,
compensation structures have been simplified dramatically to include about six
to eight items of pay. We have even seen examples in the industry of
compensation structures being simplified still further to only three items of
pay.
Typical structures, both past and present, are outlined below. Most
organizations are either at or are moving towards "B" and "C" structures. Some,
meanwhile, still follow the "A" structure, while more progressive organizations
have adopted a "D" structure.
Structures vary within an industry sector depending on its maturity and employee
demographics. For instance, banking and financial services, which traditionally
comprised a benefits-heavy structure, are rapidly moving towards a simplified,
cash-oriented model. In contrast, the FMCG and manufacturing sectors, which are
simplifying their compensation structures, are still inclined towards retaining
key benefits that have perceived employee value given the maturity and
stability of these sectors and the relatively older employee population.
Another concept that has gained popularity is that of flexible salary structures
in which an employee has the freedom to choose from a defined menu of items of
pay and to optimize his or her own tax planning. This has gained increasing
acceptance as it results in a win-win situation for both employer and
employee—the employee gains flexibility and the organization does not have to
sacrifice tax compliance.
New and emerging sectors such as retail, telecoms, aviation, IT, ITeS and AMCs
that are free of legacy issues and have a younger employee population tend to
adopt simplified structures at the outset. There are several key causes for
this trend towards rationalization:
-
A simplified tax regime has negated the tax shelter effect that most items of
pay enjoyed;
-
Organizations using simplified structures can effect sometimes significant
administrative cost savings;
-
The employee population is becoming younger and is, therefore, more oriented
towards higher cash structures and flexibility;
-
Much stricter corporate governance norms on tax compliance in employee payroll
have pushed organizations to do away with dubious “tax” items of pay; and,
-
The recently introduced Fringe Benefits Tax has significant cost implications
on most benefits-heavy organizations and is pushing firms to rethink their
structures.
Conclusion
India Inc has demonstrated tremendous growth in recent years, making it one of
the most competitive markets in the world. However with this growth, we have
also seen the emergence of a highly competitive talent market and a rise in the
cost of attracting, retaining and motivating key talent as companies
increasingly understand the importance of employing the best people. As
companies continue to face a volatile business environment made worse with
aggressive competition and scarce talent, the trend of giving out hefty salary
increases will continue. With companies are constantly looking at meaningful
ways of rewarding their workforce. Variable Pay Plans will continue to grow in
popularity. Increasingly companies will use these plans to improve competitive
positioning, enhance productivity, and adjust organization and business
priorities to suit the changing business environment.